Menu design psychology: what the research shows

Most advice about menu design sounds the same. Put your best dish in the golden triangle. Drop the dollar sign. Keep every section to seven items. Almost every guide repeats these tips, and very few link to a study.

We shoot food and build brands for cafes and restaurants in Hoi An, so we read the research on menu design psychology to see which tips have evidence behind them. Some hold up well. One of the most popular does not. Below is what we found, and what we would try on a real menu.

The short version

  • Menu design does change what guests order. A 2023 review of the research found the reported effects look real.
  • The golden triangle has the weakest support. An eye-tracking study found no sweet spots, and a four-month sales test found no change.
  • Putting a dish first or last in its section has better support. Dishes at either end were up to twice as popular as dishes in the middle.
  • Descriptive dish names sold more in two field tests. In one, sales rose 27%. In the other, the share of diners ordering the dish rose from 8.2% to 13.8%.
  • Removing the currency sign raised spending by about 8% in one test at one restaurant.
  • A shorter menu might help, but the research is mixed. Test it.

Does the golden triangle work?

The golden triangle says guests look at the middle of a menu first, then the top right, then the top left. So you put your highest-profit dishes in those spots. It shows up in three of the four guides we read for this post.

The eye-tracking evidence does not support it. In 2012, Sybil Yang put an eye tracker on diners while they read a mock two-page menu and chose a meal. On average they read it like a book, left to right and down the page. She found no sweet spot where eyes stayed longest. She did find a "sour spot" where they looked the least. Diners also seemed to pick a main dish first and build the rest of the meal around it. (Press release)

Sales tests point the same way. Clark Kincaid and David Corsun swapped two pages of a three-page menu in a field experiment and tracked item sales for four months. They found no significant difference, meaning nothing that could be told apart from chance. A 2015 literature review lists two more repositioning tests, by Bowen and Morris and by Reynolds and colleagues, with the same result.

The research is not fully settled, and a few studies do report position effects. But we did not find one showing that the triangle itself lifts sales.

The golden triangle, testedA three-panel menu with three marked zones: the middle panel, the top right and the top left, joined by a dashed path. Beside it, two findings: an eye-tracker study found diners read menus like a book with no sweet spot, and a four-month sales test found no change when menu pages were swapped.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN01/09THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE, TESTEDWhere guests look is not the same as what they order.123THE ADVICEEyes go to the middle, then the top right, then the topleft. Put your best-margin dishes there.THE EVIDENCEAn eye-tracker study found diners read amenu like a book, with no sweet spot. Afour-month sales test found no change.SOURCE · YANG (2012) · KINCAID & CORSUN (2003)FAIFO STUDIO
The golden triangle on a three-panel menu, and what the tests found.

What we would do: write the menu so it reads well from top to bottom, because that is how people read it. Put your key dishes early in each section and use the middle for the rest.

Where should your best dish go?

Position inside a list has better support than position on the page. Eran Dayan and Maya Bar-Hillel ran a lab study and a real-world study. Dishes placed at the start or end of a category list were up to twice as popular as the same dishes placed in the middle.

So put the dish you most want to sell first or last in its section. Keep the middle for dishes you are happy to sell less of.

List ends sell moreSeven dishes in one menu section. The first and last are highlighted and shown as up to twice as popular as the dishes in the middle. The bars are illustrative.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN02/09LIST ENDS SELL MOREDishes at the top or bottom of a category were up to twice as popular as those in the middle.A MENU SECTION, TOP TO BOTTOMRELATIVE POPULARITY · ILLUSTRATIVESlow-braised pork bellyUP TO 2XLemongrass chickenGrilled river prawnsMushroom claypot1XCrispy fish cakeGreen papaya saladCoconut rice puddingUP TO 2XThe study compared list ends with the centre.SOURCE · DAYAN & BAR-HILLEL (2011) · LAB AND REAL-WORLD TESTSFAIFO STUDIO
Dishes at the start or end of a list were up to twice as popular as dishes in the middle. The bars are illustrative.

Most guides say to keep each section to five to seven items. The best-known evidence is a jam study. Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper set up a tasting table in a supermarket with either 6 jams or 24. The bigger table drew more people: 60% of the shoppers who passed stopped there, against 40% at the small table. But of the shoppers who stopped to taste, 30% bought from the small table and 3% from the large one.

Later work is less clear. In 2010, Benjamin Scheibehenne and colleagues combined 50 experiments with 5,036 people. The average effect was close to zero, and results varied a lot between studies. Too much choice hurts in some settings and not in others.

Fewer choices? It dependsBar chart. With 6 jams on the table, 30% of tasters bought. With 24 jams, 3% bought. A later review of 50 experiments found the average effect was close to zero.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN03/09FEWER CHOICES? IT DEPENDSIn a famous jam study, 6 flavours outsold 24. Later research is less clear.SHARE OF TASTERS WHO BOUGHT A JAM30%6 flavours on the table3%24 flavours on thetableTHE CATCHA later review of 50 experiments found the averageeffect was close to zero. Results swung a lot betweenstudies.A shorter menu is not a sure win. It is cheapto test, and it saves kitchen time.SOURCE · IYENGAR & LEPPER (2000) · SCHEIBEHENNE ET AL. (2010)FAIFO STUDIO
The jam study, and the later review that found the average effect close to zero.

Industry data for big chains leans toward smaller menus. Aaron Allen & Associates looked at US quick-service chains from 2013 to 2017. Chains that cut menu items grew same-store sales 3.3% a year on average, against 1.9% for the rest. Over the period that added up to about 14% against 8%. The chains with the simplest menus also handled 2.7 times as many transactions per menu item as the chains with the most complex menus. This is a consultancy's analysis of large chains, not a peer-reviewed study, so treat it as a hint.

Simpler menus grew fasterBar chart of cumulative same-store sales growth from 2013 to 2017: 14% for US quick-service chains that cut menu items and 8% for chains that did not. Chains with the simplest menus handled 2.7 times as many transactions per menu item.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN04/09SIMPLER MENUS GREW FASTERChains that cut items grew 3.3% a year against 1.9% for the rest.SAME-STORE SALES GROWTH, 2013 TO 201714%Chains that cut menuitems8%Chains that did not2.7Xas many transactions per menu item at chains withthe simplest menus as at those with the mostcomplex.Large US quick-service chains. A consultancy analysis, notpeer-reviewed research.SOURCE · AARON ALLEN & ASSOCIATES (2018) · US QUICK-SERVICE CHAINSFAIFO STUDIO
Large chains that cut menu items grew faster. This is a consultancy analysis, not peer-reviewed research.

What we would do: cut the dishes that sell least and take the most work in the kitchen, then watch your numbers. Even if guests are not overwhelmed, a shorter menu means less prep and less stock to manage.

Should you remove the dollar sign?

This tip has the cleanest test. Sybil Yang, Sheryl Kimes and Mauro Sessarego gave 201 diners at a Culinary Institute of America café one of three menus, chosen at random. Prices were shown as $20, as 20, or as "twenty dollars". The group with plain numbers spent about $5.55 more each, roughly 8%. The other two menus did not differ from each other.

There are limits. It was lunch at one restaurant, and the authors say the result may not apply elsewhere. Some guides also claim that prices written in words make people spend up to 30% more. This test found no such effect. The authors think a dollar sign or the word "dollars" may remind people they are paying, but they present that as a possible reason, not a proven one.

Drop the dollar signBar chart of average check by price format, with the dollar-sign menu set to 100. Plain numbers scored 108. Written-out prices scored 100.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN05/09DROP THE DOLLAR SIGNOne randomised menu test, three ways of showing the same price.AVERAGE CHECK · DOLLAR-SIGN MENU = 100100$2010820100twenty dollarsPlain numbers: about $5.55 more perperson, roughly 8%.201 diners at a culinary school café got one of threemenus at random. The dollar-sign and written-outmenus did not differ.THE LIMITSOne café, lunch service only.SOURCE · YANG, KIMES & SESSAREGO (2009) · BARS INDEXED TO A GAP OF ABOUT 8%FAIFO STUDIO
Same dishes, three price formats. Plain numbers led to about 8% higher spending.

Two other price tips are popular but have less proof.

The first is to put the price at the end of the description, in the same size as the text, instead of in a column. WebstaurantStore says a column invites guests to compare prices and pick the cheapest dish. We found no test of this.

Price on the lineTwo menu samples. On the left, dish names connect to a right-hand column of prices with dotted lines. On the right, each price sits at the end of the dish description.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN06/09PRICE ON THE LINEWhere the price sits changes how guests read the dish.AVOID · PRICE TRAIL AND COLUMNTRY · PRICE NESTED IN THE LINESlow-braised pork belly145Lemongrass chicken120Grilled river prawns165Mushroom claypot110Slow-braised pork bellyLemongrass, black pepper caramel, rice, 145Lemongrass chickenWok-charred, chilli lime, herbs, 120Grilled river prawnsTurmeric butter, garlic, charcoal grill, 165Mushroom claypotWild mushrooms, ginger, clay pot rice, 110Eyes run down the column and compare.Eyes read the dish first, then the price.SOURCE · WEBSTAURANTSTORE · INDUSTRY GUIDANCE, NOT A TESTED RESULTFAIFO STUDIO
A price column invites comparison, according to WebstaurantStore. We found no test of this.

The second is price endings. In a small pizzeria with 1,271 customers, a pizza priced at 7.99 euros was chosen more often than the same pizza at 8.00 euros, but only when the other pizzas ended in zero. When every price ended in 9, or every price ended in 0, there was no difference. It is one small study, but it suggests a .99 ending works best on the one dish you want people to notice.

Working on a menu?

Faifo is a photography, film and brand studio in Hoi An. We shoot food and build the brand and marketing around it for cafes and restaurants. Tell us what you are working on.

Talk to Faifo

Do better dish names sell more?

In the tests we found, yes. In 2001, Brian Wansink and colleagues replaced plain names with descriptive ones for six dishes in a university cafeteria. Over six weeks and 140 customers, sales of those dishes were 27% higher. Diners also rated the food and the cafeteria more highly.

One caveat. Wansink later left Cornell after the university found he had committed academic misconduct in his research, and 18 of his papers were retracted. We found no retraction notice for this one, but we did not want to rely on it alone.

The second test comes from France. Nicolas Guéguen and Céline Jacob changed dish names in a small restaurant with 1,838 diners. A dish with a family tie in the name, such as "Grandma's home-made baked potatoes" instead of "baked potatoes", was ordered by 13.8% of diners, against 8.2% with the usual name. Names that hinted at tradition or patriotism also did better than the usual name.

Both studies are small, so treat the exact numbers with care. The pattern is clear enough to act on. Describe how a dish is cooked, where it comes from, or who it reminds people of. Keep it true, though. Wansink's own paper says descriptive labels should be used sparingly and appropriately.

WebstaurantStore suggests 12 to 18 words for each description. It also says words like "light" and "healthy" can make food sound less tasty, and that naming the ingredient, such as grass-fed beef, works better than making a health claim.

Words change ordersTwo bar charts. In a cafeteria test, sales of dishes with descriptive labels were 127 against 100 for plain labels. In a restaurant test, 13.8% of diners ordered a dish with a family label against 8.2% with the usual label.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN07/09WORDS CHANGE ORDERSTwo field tests of dish names, both pointing the same way.SALES OF THE SAME DISHES · PLAIN = 100100Plain label127Descriptive labelSix-week cafeteria test, 140 customers.SHARE OF DINERS WHO ORDERED THE DISH8.2%Usual label13.8%Family labelRestaurant test, 1,838 diners.SOURCE · WANSINK ET AL. (2001) · GUÉGUEN & JACOB (2012)FAIFO STUDIO
Two field tests of dish names.

What about white space, colour and photos?

The evidence here is thinner, and most of it is industry advice. White space, a box or a border pulls the eye to a dish. WebstaurantStore says to highlight only one or two dishes per section. If you box everything, nothing stands out. It also suggests about one photo per page or section on a printed menu, and says red, yellow and orange stimulate appetite while blue works against it. We did not find sales tests for the colour claims in the sources we read, so treat them as design taste, not proof.

Menus on phones and delivery apps

Digital menus read differently. WebstaurantStore's guide says guests have a shorter attention span on a phone, so you need clear categories, fast loading and little scrolling. It suggests a best sellers group at the top and says delivery menus lean on photos. This is where good food photography does most of the selling, because guests cannot taste anything before they order.

Design tips work best when you know which dishes deserve them. The standard method is the menu matrix, from Michael Kasavana and Donald Smith at Michigan State University (1982). You need 60 to 90 days of sales. For each dish, note the number sold, the price and the food cost. Price minus food cost is the profit on each plate.

Then work out the average number sold and the average profit per plate across your menu. A dish above average on both is a star. Popular with low profit is a plowhorse. Unpopular with high profit is a puzzle. Below average on both is a dog.

Sort before you redesignA two-by-two menu matrix. Popular, high-profit dishes are stars. Popular, low-profit dishes are plowhorses. Unpopular, high-profit dishes are puzzles. Unpopular, low-profit dishes are dogs.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN08/09SORT BEFORE YOU REDESIGNThe menu matrix: 60 to 90 days of sales, plotted by popularity and profit.PLOWHORSESPOPULAR · LOW PROFITTrim cost or portion. Do not push.STARSPOPULAR · HIGH PROFITFeature it. Protect the recipe.DOGSUNPOPULAR · LOW PROFITRemove it. Never promote it.PUZZLESUNPOPULAR · HIGH PROFITRename it, move it, add a cue.PROFIT PER PLATE · LOW TO HIGHPOPULARITY · LOW TO HIGHSOURCE · KASAVANA & SMITH (1982) · WEBSTAURANTSTORE GUIDEFAIFO STUDIO
The menu matrix, with the usual action for each group.

Puzzles are where design work pays off. A better name, a better position or a word from your staff can help them. Leave the recipe and portion of your stars alone. Plowhorses may need a small change to cost or portion size. Dogs can usually go, unless you need them for kids or dietary needs. Check the kitchen too. A high-profit dish that slows the line at peak service is not a star. WebstaurantStore suggests rebuilding the matrix every quarter, and again after any food cost change of 5% or more.

What holds up and what does not

A 2023 review by Robin Chark and Michael Ip looked at the menu design literature as a whole. It found that the reported effects look real and do not seem to come from p-hacking, which means choosing statistics until something looks significant. So menu design works. The trouble is that individual tips vary a lot in how well they have been tested.

What holds upA table rating six menu design tips by the evidence behind them. Top or bottom of a list and descriptive dish names are supported. No currency sign and .99 price endings each rest on one venue. Shorter menu sections are mixed. Golden triangle zones showed no effect.FAIFO STUDIO · MENU DESIGN09/09WHAT HOLDS UPOur read of the studies in this post. Each one is small or tied to one setting.TACTICWHAT THE TESTS FOUNDOUR READTOP OR BOTTOM OF A LISTUp to 2x as popular as the middle, in two tests.SUPPORTEDDESCRIPTIVE DISH NAMESSales +27%, and 8.2% to 13.8%, in two tests.SUPPORTEDNO CURRENCY SIGNAbout 8% higher checks in one test.ONE VENUEPRICE ENDINGS OF .99Helped only when other prices ended in 0.ONE VENUESHORTER MENU SECTIONSOne strong study. A 50-study review: near zero.MIXEDGOLDEN TRIANGLE ZONESEye tracking and a sales test found no effect.NO EFFECT FOUNDTEST ANY CHANGE ON ONE MENU SECTION, THEN COMPARE SALES BEFORE AND AFTERFAIFO STUDIO
How well each tip stands up, in our reading of the studies.

Almost every study here is small, and many took place at one venue. Guests differ by country and by type of venue, so treat these findings as ideas to test, not guarantees.

How to test a menu change

Change one section at a time. Write down the date. Then compare sales for 30 to 90 days before and after, which is the window WebstaurantStore suggests. Look at units sold per dish and average spend per guest. Total sales can mislead you, because one busy week makes everything look better.

Menu design checklist

  • Write the menu so it reads well from top to bottom.
  • Put the dish you most want to sell first or last in its section.
  • Cut the dishes that sell least and take the most work.
  • Test prices as plain numbers, with no currency sign.
  • Describe dishes by method, origin or memory, in about 12 to 18 words, and keep it true.
  • Build a menu matrix from 60 to 90 days of sales before you redesign.
  • Change one section at a time and compare sales.

Frequently asked questions

What is menu design psychology?

It is the study of how a menu's layout, wording and prices affect what guests order. Researchers test things like where a dish sits on the page, how it is named and how its price is shown.

Does the golden triangle work on a menu?

We found no good evidence that it does. An eye-tracking study found diners read menus like a book with no sweet spots, and a four-month sales test found no change after items were moved. Position within a list has better support.

Should I remove the dollar sign from my menu prices?

It is worth testing. In one study of 201 diners, a menu with plain numbers led to about 8% higher spending than menus with a dollar sign or prices written in words. It was one lunch service at one café, so check it on your own guests.

How many items should a menu section have?

Most guides say five to seven. The research is mixed. One famous study found 6 jams outsold 24, but a review of 50 experiments found the average effect was close to zero. Cut the dishes that sell least and see what happens.

What is menu engineering?

It is a method for sorting dishes by how often they sell and how much profit they make. Michael Kasavana and Donald Smith developed it at Michigan State University in 1982. Dishes fall into four groups: stars, plowhorses, puzzles and dogs.

How often should I update my menu?

WebstaurantStore suggests rebuilding your menu matrix every quarter, and again whenever food costs move by 5% or more.

Need a hand with your menu?

Faifo Studio is a photography, film and brand studio in Hoi An. We shoot food and build the brand and marketing around it for cafes and restaurants. If you are redoing a menu, opening a new place, or unhappy with how your food looks online, tell us what you are working on.

You can see how we work in our launch media for Auko, an eco-wellness resort in Phong Nha, and the brand we built for OTA Playhouse in Hoi An. Our F&B packages include menu redesign, or browse all our work.

Talk to Faifo Studio

Sources