Menu design psychology: what the research shows
Most advice about menu design sounds the same. Put your best dish in the golden triangle. Drop the dollar sign. Keep every section to seven items. Almost every guide repeats these tips, and very few link to a study.
We shoot food and build brands for cafes and restaurants in Hoi An, so we read the research on menu design psychology to see which tips have evidence behind them. Some hold up well. One of the most popular does not. Below is what we found, and what we would try on a real menu.
The short version
- Menu design does change what guests order. A 2023 review of the research found the reported effects look real.
- The golden triangle has the weakest support. An eye-tracking study found no sweet spots, and a four-month sales test found no change.
- Putting a dish first or last in its section has better support. Dishes at either end were up to twice as popular as dishes in the middle.
- Descriptive dish names sold more in two field tests. In one, sales rose 27%. In the other, the share of diners ordering the dish rose from 8.2% to 13.8%.
- Removing the currency sign raised spending by about 8% in one test at one restaurant.
- A shorter menu might help, but the research is mixed. Test it.
In this post
- Does the golden triangle work?
- Where should your best dish go?
- Should you cut items from your menu?
- Should you remove the dollar sign?
- Do better dish names sell more?
- What about white space, colour and photos?
- Menus on phones and delivery apps
- How to find your best dishes
- What holds up and what does not
- How to test a menu change
- Menu design checklist
- Frequently asked questions
Does the golden triangle work?
The golden triangle says guests look at the middle of a menu first, then the top right, then the top left. So you put your highest-profit dishes in those spots. It shows up in three of the four guides we read for this post.
The eye-tracking evidence does not support it. In 2012, Sybil Yang put an eye tracker on diners while they read a mock two-page menu and chose a meal. On average they read it like a book, left to right and down the page. She found no sweet spot where eyes stayed longest. She did find a "sour spot" where they looked the least. Diners also seemed to pick a main dish first and build the rest of the meal around it. (Press release)
Sales tests point the same way. Clark Kincaid and David Corsun swapped two pages of a three-page menu in a field experiment and tracked item sales for four months. They found no significant difference, meaning nothing that could be told apart from chance. A 2015 literature review lists two more repositioning tests, by Bowen and Morris and by Reynolds and colleagues, with the same result.
The research is not fully settled, and a few studies do report position effects. But we did not find one showing that the triangle itself lifts sales.
What we would do: write the menu so it reads well from top to bottom, because that is how people read it. Put your key dishes early in each section and use the middle for the rest.
Where should your best dish go?
Position inside a list has better support than position on the page. Eran Dayan and Maya Bar-Hillel ran a lab study and a real-world study. Dishes placed at the start or end of a category list were up to twice as popular as the same dishes placed in the middle.
So put the dish you most want to sell first or last in its section. Keep the middle for dishes you are happy to sell less of.
Should you cut items from your menu?
Most guides say to keep each section to five to seven items. The best-known evidence is a jam study. Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper set up a tasting table in a supermarket with either 6 jams or 24. The bigger table drew more people: 60% of the shoppers who passed stopped there, against 40% at the small table. But of the shoppers who stopped to taste, 30% bought from the small table and 3% from the large one.
Later work is less clear. In 2010, Benjamin Scheibehenne and colleagues combined 50 experiments with 5,036 people. The average effect was close to zero, and results varied a lot between studies. Too much choice hurts in some settings and not in others.
Industry data for big chains leans toward smaller menus. Aaron Allen & Associates looked at US quick-service chains from 2013 to 2017. Chains that cut menu items grew same-store sales 3.3% a year on average, against 1.9% for the rest. Over the period that added up to about 14% against 8%. The chains with the simplest menus also handled 2.7 times as many transactions per menu item as the chains with the most complex menus. This is a consultancy's analysis of large chains, not a peer-reviewed study, so treat it as a hint.
What we would do: cut the dishes that sell least and take the most work in the kitchen, then watch your numbers. Even if guests are not overwhelmed, a shorter menu means less prep and less stock to manage.
Should you remove the dollar sign?
This tip has the cleanest test. Sybil Yang, Sheryl Kimes and Mauro Sessarego gave 201 diners at a Culinary Institute of America café one of three menus, chosen at random. Prices were shown as $20, as 20, or as "twenty dollars". The group with plain numbers spent about $5.55 more each, roughly 8%. The other two menus did not differ from each other.
There are limits. It was lunch at one restaurant, and the authors say the result may not apply elsewhere. Some guides also claim that prices written in words make people spend up to 30% more. This test found no such effect. The authors think a dollar sign or the word "dollars" may remind people they are paying, but they present that as a possible reason, not a proven one.
Two other price tips are popular but have less proof.
The first is to put the price at the end of the description, in the same size as the text, instead of in a column. WebstaurantStore says a column invites guests to compare prices and pick the cheapest dish. We found no test of this.
The second is price endings. In a small pizzeria with 1,271 customers, a pizza priced at 7.99 euros was chosen more often than the same pizza at 8.00 euros, but only when the other pizzas ended in zero. When every price ended in 9, or every price ended in 0, there was no difference. It is one small study, but it suggests a .99 ending works best on the one dish you want people to notice.
Working on a menu?
Faifo is a photography, film and brand studio in Hoi An. We shoot food and build the brand and marketing around it for cafes and restaurants. Tell us what you are working on.
Talk to FaifoDo better dish names sell more?
In the tests we found, yes. In 2001, Brian Wansink and colleagues replaced plain names with descriptive ones for six dishes in a university cafeteria. Over six weeks and 140 customers, sales of those dishes were 27% higher. Diners also rated the food and the cafeteria more highly.
One caveat. Wansink later left Cornell after the university found he had committed academic misconduct in his research, and 18 of his papers were retracted. We found no retraction notice for this one, but we did not want to rely on it alone.
The second test comes from France. Nicolas Guéguen and Céline Jacob changed dish names in a small restaurant with 1,838 diners. A dish with a family tie in the name, such as "Grandma's home-made baked potatoes" instead of "baked potatoes", was ordered by 13.8% of diners, against 8.2% with the usual name. Names that hinted at tradition or patriotism also did better than the usual name.
Both studies are small, so treat the exact numbers with care. The pattern is clear enough to act on. Describe how a dish is cooked, where it comes from, or who it reminds people of. Keep it true, though. Wansink's own paper says descriptive labels should be used sparingly and appropriately.
WebstaurantStore suggests 12 to 18 words for each description. It also says words like "light" and "healthy" can make food sound less tasty, and that naming the ingredient, such as grass-fed beef, works better than making a health claim.
What about white space, colour and photos?
The evidence here is thinner, and most of it is industry advice. White space, a box or a border pulls the eye to a dish. WebstaurantStore says to highlight only one or two dishes per section. If you box everything, nothing stands out. It also suggests about one photo per page or section on a printed menu, and says red, yellow and orange stimulate appetite while blue works against it. We did not find sales tests for the colour claims in the sources we read, so treat them as design taste, not proof.
Menus on phones and delivery apps
Digital menus read differently. WebstaurantStore's guide says guests have a shorter attention span on a phone, so you need clear categories, fast loading and little scrolling. It suggests a best sellers group at the top and says delivery menus lean on photos. This is where good food photography does most of the selling, because guests cannot taste anything before they order.
How to find your best dishes
Design tips work best when you know which dishes deserve them. The standard method is the menu matrix, from Michael Kasavana and Donald Smith at Michigan State University (1982). You need 60 to 90 days of sales. For each dish, note the number sold, the price and the food cost. Price minus food cost is the profit on each plate.
Then work out the average number sold and the average profit per plate across your menu. A dish above average on both is a star. Popular with low profit is a plowhorse. Unpopular with high profit is a puzzle. Below average on both is a dog.
Puzzles are where design work pays off. A better name, a better position or a word from your staff can help them. Leave the recipe and portion of your stars alone. Plowhorses may need a small change to cost or portion size. Dogs can usually go, unless you need them for kids or dietary needs. Check the kitchen too. A high-profit dish that slows the line at peak service is not a star. WebstaurantStore suggests rebuilding the matrix every quarter, and again after any food cost change of 5% or more.
What holds up and what does not
A 2023 review by Robin Chark and Michael Ip looked at the menu design literature as a whole. It found that the reported effects look real and do not seem to come from p-hacking, which means choosing statistics until something looks significant. So menu design works. The trouble is that individual tips vary a lot in how well they have been tested.
Almost every study here is small, and many took place at one venue. Guests differ by country and by type of venue, so treat these findings as ideas to test, not guarantees.
How to test a menu change
Change one section at a time. Write down the date. Then compare sales for 30 to 90 days before and after, which is the window WebstaurantStore suggests. Look at units sold per dish and average spend per guest. Total sales can mislead you, because one busy week makes everything look better.
Menu design checklist
- Write the menu so it reads well from top to bottom.
- Put the dish you most want to sell first or last in its section.
- Cut the dishes that sell least and take the most work.
- Test prices as plain numbers, with no currency sign.
- Describe dishes by method, origin or memory, in about 12 to 18 words, and keep it true.
- Build a menu matrix from 60 to 90 days of sales before you redesign.
- Change one section at a time and compare sales.
Frequently asked questions
What is menu design psychology?
It is the study of how a menu's layout, wording and prices affect what guests order. Researchers test things like where a dish sits on the page, how it is named and how its price is shown.
Does the golden triangle work on a menu?
We found no good evidence that it does. An eye-tracking study found diners read menus like a book with no sweet spots, and a four-month sales test found no change after items were moved. Position within a list has better support.
Should I remove the dollar sign from my menu prices?
It is worth testing. In one study of 201 diners, a menu with plain numbers led to about 8% higher spending than menus with a dollar sign or prices written in words. It was one lunch service at one café, so check it on your own guests.
How many items should a menu section have?
Most guides say five to seven. The research is mixed. One famous study found 6 jams outsold 24, but a review of 50 experiments found the average effect was close to zero. Cut the dishes that sell least and see what happens.
What is menu engineering?
It is a method for sorting dishes by how often they sell and how much profit they make. Michael Kasavana and Donald Smith developed it at Michigan State University in 1982. Dishes fall into four groups: stars, plowhorses, puzzles and dogs.
How often should I update my menu?
WebstaurantStore suggests rebuilding your menu matrix every quarter, and again whenever food costs move by 5% or more.
Need a hand with your menu?
Faifo Studio is a photography, film and brand studio in Hoi An. We shoot food and build the brand and marketing around it for cafes and restaurants. If you are redoing a menu, opening a new place, or unhappy with how your food looks online, tell us what you are working on.
You can see how we work in our launch media for Auko, an eco-wellness resort in Phong Nha, and the brand we built for OTA Playhouse in Hoi An. Our F&B packages include menu redesign, or browse all our work.
Talk to Faifo StudioSources
- Yang, S. S. (2012). Eye movements on restaurant menus: a revisitation on gaze motion and consumer scanpaths. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 1021-1029.
- Kincaid, C. S., & Corsun, D. L. (2003). Are consultants blowing smoke? An empirical test of the impact of menu layout on item sales. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(4), 226-231.
- Özdemir, B., & Çalışkan, O. (2015). Menu design: a review of literature. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18.
- Dayan, E., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 333-342.
- Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006.
- Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409-425.
- Yang, S. S., Kimes, S. E., & Sessarego, M. M. (2009). $ or dollars: Effects of menu-price formats on restaurant checks. Cornell Hospitality Report, 9(8). See also the Cornell Chronicle summary.
- Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., Legohérel, P., & Ngobo, P.-V. (2009). Nine-ending prices and consumer's behavior: A field study in a restaurant. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 170-172.
- Wansink, B., Painter, J., & van Ittersum, K. (2001). Descriptive menu labels' effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(6), 68-72.
- Guéguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2012). The effect of menu labels associated with affect, tradition and patriotism on sales. Food Quality and Preference, 23(1), 86-88.
- Chark, R., & Ip, M. M. H. (2023). Is menu design effective? A p-curving analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108.
- Kasavana, M. L., & Smith, D. I. (1982). Menu engineering: a practical guide to menu analysis. Michigan State University.
- Aaron Allen & Associates. Menu simplification: it's working; and The psychology of restaurant menu design.
- WebstaurantStore. Menu engineering; and Mydigimenu, restaurant menu psychology principles.
- Google Business Profile Help. About the menu editor.